Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Any plans to support LUA for Ultra App Kit ? I remember it was one of the funding goals. If it can work nicely I think it would make your product much more accessible.

Posted

No, but Ultra Engine will support Lua and it includes all the functionality of Ultra App Kit.

My job is to make tools you love, with the features you want, and performance you can't live without.

Posted

The release executables are pretty small and they can ship without any extra files or DLLs.

  • Like 1

My job is to make tools you love, with the features you want, and performance you can't live without.

Posted
1 hour ago, source said:

I do do net understands what you mean. Can you erabolate?

I mean you have to understand the logic of programming and game development. But dont worry Ultraengine community helps a lot, helps your code work and so on.

Posted

But I do not understand. Whay are you telling me i have to understand something that you think i do not understanded? What it has to do with what i said before.....

can you elaborat?

Posted

I think @source is just asking about the size of the executable, and any other files, if he is just making a GUI application.

  • Like 1

My job is to make tools you love, with the features you want, and performance you can't live without.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Josh said:

I think @source is just asking about the size of the executable, and any other files, if he is just making a GUI application.

Yes

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

@josh give beta or alpha build branch steam users for leadwerk 4 with errors. Or demo Josh times goes on. Or release Early access on steam. involve new auditory how? I dont know 

My job is to make you see useful things in trash.

 
Posted
52 minutes ago, trashcanuseful said:

@josh give beta or alpha build branch steam users for leadwerk 4 with errors. Or demo Josh times goes on. Or release Early access on steam. involve new auditory how? I dont know 

ultra it its x10 times faster in vr. it its better then leadwerks !

Posted
Just now, Vida Marcell said:

Have you seen his other comments? This dude is very angry

understandable but you look angry too and also trashing my thread by further inflaming off topic discussion

Posted
5 minutes ago, source said:

understandable but you look angry too and also trashing my thread by further inflaming off topic discussion

Youre right, im sorry, i just wasnt understanding why was you thinking you have to ship Leadwerks with UAK.

Posted
1 minute ago, Vida Marcell said:

Youre right, im sorry, i just wasnt understanding why was you thinking you have to ship Leadwerks with UAK.

I understanded your confucianism now. I explain so you understanded now. I was asking if josh would make it so lua integrates into uak bcsause it was one of the goals - not - met in his fundraiding campaing. So josh said look, you will have it in ultra engine no need to integrate to uak but i dont have acces to ulta engine so i ask does UAK(that its integrates in ultra engine) need to be compiled with extra binaries or some other resources relevanted to ultra engine(3d and stuff) as game engines usually do - to which he replied no. ended my questionaire and all was good, however it appeared you thought i didnt understood something so you gave a friendly and constructive advice that you gave that i should learns more about whatever you thought i didnt understanded.  

hope it clarifies. i never thoght leadwerks ships with uak, you thought i thought that.

Posted
2 minutes ago, source said:

I understanded your confucianism now. I explain so you understanded now. I was asking if josh would make it so lua integrates into uak bcsause it was one of the goals - not - met in his fundraiding campaing. So josh said look, you will have it in ultra engine no need to integrate to uak but i dont have acces to ulta engine so i ask does UAK(that its integrates in ultra engine) need to be compiled with extra binaries or some other resources relevanted to ultra engine(3d and stuff) as game engines usually do - to which he replied no. ended my questionaire and all was good, however it appeared you thought i didnt understood something so you gave a friendly and constructive advice that you gave that i should learns more about whatever you thought i didnt understanded.  

hope it clarifies. i never thoght leadwerks ships with uak, you thought i thought that.

Now i understand, i was a dumb ****, sorry for the inconvenience.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Vida Marcell said:

Now i understand, i was a dumb ****, sorry for the inconvenience.

Don't worry about it. I still love you. - Johnny(The Room)

Posted
5 hours ago, trashcanuseful said:

sorry guys for the negativity, but there was no negativity

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Undersantdable. We worked it out! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...