Criteria for inclusion in SDK

[flachdrache]

As of actual using .Net derivations, in a no "one hit wonder" environment - there where several issues i had in the past with it.

Namely it was always a constant w.i.p. - especially with the XNA framework including abandoned support for so called "project updaters".

Within leadwerks it had been the license question issue which made me not using it -

if its provided "As-Is" its more close to "public-domain" but non the less these restrictions made it somewhat float in mid air, beside (in the mean time) its about two years ago i wrote something good with it. If its included in the sdk, within the same eula - i might rather use the provided engine commands in a .Net, for extended game-tools-pipeline programing than a strange 3rd party openGL solution.

[ZioRed]

I have a problem with the use of the logo here, and this is a good time to talk about it. I'd prefer if people use this image from now on:

http://www.leadwerks.com/werkspace/files/file/236-powered-by-leadwerks-logo

Leadwerks Builder has been updated just now with this new logo as requested

[Roland]

Leadwerks Builder has been updated just now with this new logo as requested

Great