Search the Community

1. Does not work on current beta build (invisible). Can be fixed with new Lighting.glsl shader which was not yet added to build. 2. On one side normal looks correct like scratch and on other like "vein": 3. If surface have normal map, decal looks wrong by having different color and visible borders. Most likely it's happens due full "rewrite" of surface normal map. Can be decal normal map be just "above" or something like that to prevent it? Map, mats, shader: DecalNormals.zip

Hi everyone, I'm finding problems in my model "Crane", initially it was physical, now they are normal faces. I tried using the "Normal Average" setting and the model seems to be made of plush ... When I configure the template with "Normal Threshhold" my template is completely bugged, as the images follow. I refitted the model obeying all topology of polygons. Please if anyone can help me solve this problem thank you. Thank you!

I'm trying to make a cel shaded shader and am working on the outline part. Everything seems to work well except for this: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=603858840 It seems to me like the normals past a certain depth are not uniform and I'm not really sure why. Or is this just Nyquist-like effect? If so, what would be the best way to handle this? This is the shader I wrote (there's a simple lua script that binds the diffuse, depth and normal textures): #version 400 uniform sampler2D texture1; //diffuse uniform sampler2DMS texture2; //depth uniform sampler2DMS texture3; //normal uniform vec2 camerarange; uniform bool isbackbuffer; uniform vec2 buffersize; out vec4 fragData0; #define width 2 float DepthToZPosition(in float depth) { return camerarange.x / (camerarange.y - depth * (camerarange.y - camerarange.x)) * camerarange.y; } void main(void) { vec2 texcoord = gl_FragCoord.xy/buffersize + 0.5/(buffersize*0.5); if (isbackbuffer) texcoord.y = 1.0 - texcoord.y; vec4 c = texture(texture1, texcoord); //Line Detection bool edge = false; float depth = DepthToZPosition(texelFetch(texture2,ivec2(texcoord*buffersize),0).x); float depth_temp = 0; vec3 normal = texelFetch(texture3,ivec2(texcoord*buffersize),0).xyz; normal=normal/length(normal); vec3 normal_temp = vec3(0); // Check adjacent pixels for (int x=-1; x<2; x+=2) for (int y=-1; y<2; y+=2) { depth_temp = DepthToZPosition(texelFetch(texture2,ivec2(texcoord*buffersize)+ivec2(x*width,y*width),0).x); normal_temp = texelFetch(texture3,ivec2(texcoord*buffersize)+ivec2(x*width,y*width),0).xyz; normal_temp = normal_temp/length(normal_temp); if ((abs(dot(normal_temp,normal)) < 1) && (abs(depth_temp-depth) > .1)) { edge = true; } } fragData0 = c; if (edge) { fragData0 = vec4(0,0,0,c.a); } }

Forgive me if this is a silly question, but my previous experience with collision normals is as follows: collision on X should return Vec3(1,0,0) collision on -X should return Vec3(-1,0,0) collision on Y should return Vec3(0,1,0) collision on -Y should return Vec3(0,-1,0) collision on Z should return Vec3(0,0,1) collision on -Z should return Vec3(0,0,-1) Leadwerks pickinfo.normal returns a fraction depending on where on a face the collision occurs. Is pickinfo.face the "normal" function I'm used to, and maybe pickinfo.normal is describing the hit point? If this is the case, how do you use pickinfo.face, I couldn't find much documentation on it? Thanks!